As I mentioned in my previous blog entry, I have came across
new evidence that Bramante may have had other intentions relating to
Michelangelo painting the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel than originally
thought. In Ross King’s book,
‘Michelangelo and The Pope’s Ceiling’, he says, “Bramante knew that
Michelangelo not only lacked valuable experience in the tricky art of fresco
but also understood little of the technique by which frescoists created
illusionistic effects on high, curved surfaces.
Painters of vaults, such as Andrea Mantegna, would portray bodies in a
receding perspective – lower limbs in the foreground, heads in the background –
so that they appeared to be suspended in the air above the spectator. Mastery of this virtuoso method of
foreshortening, often known as ‘di sotto in su’ (from below upward), was
notoriously difficult.” When knowing
this apparent lack of a particular skill of Michelangelo’s, it makes sense that
Bramante was worried about him painting the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. Along with Pope Julius II, he had dedicated
much of himself to rebuilding Rome. From
this account, it seems as though he was genuinely worried about the outcome of
the frescos. He was trying to avoid a
disaster that could possibly taint the atmosphere of one of the most
significant chapels to the Christian faith.
However, it
seems as though Piero Rosselli openly disagreed with Bramante’s opinions
regarding Michelangelo’s painting techniques.
On page 27, Ross King quotes Piero Rosselli saying to the Pope, “Holy
father, he has never spoken to Michelangelo, and if anything he has just told
you is true, I would like you to cut off my head.” Although it is not evident
that a decision on the Sistine Chapel ceiling was made that night when they
were all talking, it did come about the Pope Julius II summoned Michelangelo to
Rome to begin work on the now magnificent frescos.
I am glad he chose not to paint the ceiling di sotto in su
ReplyDelete